🔗 Share this article

Transpired he endured losing against lower-league opposition. He weathered a decisive continental showpiece versus a particularly poor Tottenham teams for many years. He could survive losing at home against West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, his rigid approach, laying waste to some of the club’s best homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, calling the squad the worst in Manchester United history. But there was one adversary with whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to tango. If you challenge the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, similar to numerous Premiership defender in Blackburn’s championship campaign, the coach came at Jason Wilcox and seems to have failed. Even the most distracted of readers can see the paradoxical situation: a coach who often railed his squad for losing one-on-one duels succumbing when confronted by the intense pressure and formidable presence of a the Premier League’s most feared sporting directors.

In truth, this entire painful saga appears to portray the director in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been tempting, given his brief stint in a similar role with the Saints, to regard him as merely a drudge in the United exoskeleton: a man who owed his position largely to his close relationship with his former boss Omar Berrada rather than any verifiable talent. How wrong we all were. By masterfully outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated manager, just as he bested the hapless a previous executive before him, he has proved himself as one of football's true generals: a tactical intellect that United’s mid-table rivals are now rightly wary.

The Tactical Conflict Regarding Formation and Ideology

To illustrate, it was the director who being involved in the hierarchy that hired the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach in the first place, was instrumental in attempting to convince him to abandon his favored formation. Naturally, these pleas faced pushback. But perhaps these judgements hold greater authority when delivered by a man with the impeccable soccer background he possesses, a veteran of three England caps and a contributor to a title-winning side decades past.

Maybe eventually he might agree to outline his reasoning publicly. Perhaps at some point he might be asked why Amorim is departing with a full payout, with no penalty clause in place. The director seldom speaks in public, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals of this sport – men like him – function on a plane exceeding our prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, most likely all we would hear is a series of high-frequency signals and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not equivalent to being prepared to comprehend it.

The Ultimate Power Behind Command

But of course, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the real power behind the club's current leadership. The director is, after all, merely executing the directives of his ultimate line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has emphasized his preference for a four-man defense. According to reports, Ratcliffe has also suggested deploying the forward as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for the club to adopt data science and metrics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit soon after his minority ownership, he announced that the team's approach of play “will be decided in this room”.

After all, Ratcliffe is a specialist in these intricate footballing stuff, drawing from his previous experience in industry and yachting. Most importantly he is immensely wealthy, and it is known, the rich are superior: more perceptive, more wise, more tactically astute, simply superior. Who else could one trust to manage an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the building of a new stadium that looks similar to an abstract design, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

The Modern Football Hierarchy: Directors Above Coaches

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing in top-tier football. Historically, teams mistakenly entrusted major sporting choices to low-level employees such as coaches, scouts – players themselves. Perhaps it was once possible for a young, visionary coach with ideas and drive to go into an organization and implement their plan through to completion. But how many businesses have these guys set up? What number of mass redundancies have they managed? Far preferable to invest genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with impressive professional resumes. Better by far to determine the strategy by the directors and appoint someone who can tailor their offering to suit. If managers were formerly chefs, they have become more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not really responsible for the food, but still finally accountable if it arrives cold or leaks out of the box.

Nowadays, a coach's role has become less about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the public face of an organisation they have minimal power to influence. A coach at Chelsea leads a team of very young players into Europe and secures domestic cups, and essentially is dismissed for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy sees his reputation ruined while the people who hired him live to blunder another day.

The Neoliberal Game: Accountability Only for the Coaches

And possibly in a small way this is simply corporate governance in action: the elevation of a gilded overclass who are infallible, whose choices remain sacrosanct, whose errors can invariably be sacked away without justification. Hire the system coach only to dismiss him for playing excessively that system. Bring in the project manager and then discard him for requiring too long. And above all be grateful; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for the latest summer signings, for the reality that the adults – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.